Q

The Bear Creek Process

From Concern to Radical Witness

The Quaker Conundrum

Bear Creek Friends Meeting faces a profound spiritual paradox. While maintaining a historic "Peace Testimony" against war, the community has recognized a "catastrophic moral failure": complicity in the systemic violence of Christian Colonial Capitalist Violence (CCV).

The New Idea (Input)

"The New Conscientious Objector (NewCO)"

A proposal to expand the Peace Testimony from a static refusal of war to an Active Objection against the systems of capitalism and colonialism through LANDBACK, Mutual Aid, and Abolition.

The Architecture of the Crisis

1
The History 1877 Separation (Immediatism) vs. Gradualism
2
The Diagnosis Christian Ideology + Colonial Conquest + Capitalism
3
The Mandate Move from "Charity" to "Solidarity & Reparations"

The Discernment Engine

Quakers do not vote. They seek "Unity" with the Spirit. This interactive diagram illustrates the iterative process Bear Creek Meeting uses to wrestle with the radical demands of the NewCO framework.

START

1. Individual Leading

The "Weight" of Concern

2. Committee Seasoning

Peace & Social Concerns

3. Corporate Discernment

Meeting for Business

4. The Witness

Adoption & Action

1. Individual Leading

Initiation

The Action

An individual Friend (e.g., Jeff Kisling) experiences a spiritual "incommensurability"—a feeling that their current life does not align with the Truth. They draft an "Epistle" or proposal (NewCO) identifying the new threat (CCV).

The Core Query

"Does consistency of faith demand an expansion of our refusal of war to a holistic objection to the entire architecture of systemic violence?"

The Obstacle

The "Inner Critic" and fear of disruption.

Historical Precedent

Seth Laughlin (Civil War): Refusing the act of killing.

Process Iteration Status: Active

The Arc of Conscience

The NewCO is not a break from tradition, but a "Continuing Revelation." This chart tracks the expanding definition of "Violence" recognized by Iowa Conservative Friends over 160 years.

  • 1860s: Refusal of the Act (Killing).
  • 1948: Refusal of the Institution (Draft Registration).
  • 2025: Refusal of the System (Capitalism/Colonialism).

Charity vs. Solidarity

The shift from traditional benevolence to NewCO Mutual Aid requires a fundamental change in structure.

The Old Way (Charity)

Vertical Hierarchy

"Us giving to Them." Maintains the status quo by alleviating symptoms without changing power structures. Often reinforces "White Saviorism."

The NewCO Way (Mutual Aid)

Horizontal Reciprocity

"Solidarity, Not Charity." A shared struggle where everyone has needs and gifts. Makes the hierarchy required for white supremacy impossible.

The Alliance Ecosystem

The "Witness" is not solitary. Bear Creek Meeting implements the NewCO through a specific, interdependent web of relationships. Each entity plays a distinct strategic role.

🧭

GPAS

Great Plains Action Society

Role: Strategic Leadership. Indigenous-led. They set the agenda, diagnose CCV, and direct LANDBACK efforts.

Key Figure: Sikowis Nobiss
🤝

DMMA

Des Moines Mutual Aid

Role: Tactical Support. The "Hands." Provides bail funds, food, and survival infrastructure outside the state.

Key Figure: Ronnie James
💰

DRN

Decolonial Repair Network

Role: Ally Support. A mechanism for non-Natives to funnel resources (Reparations) to Indigenous leadership.

Function: Risk Absorption
🕯️

BCFM

Bear Creek Friends Meeting

Role: Spiritual Container. The local Quaker body testing the "NewCO" as a valid expression of ancient faith.

Key Figure: Jeff Kisling